DHPA

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Leadership
      • Executive Committee
      • Board Members
    • DHPA Members
    • Contact Us
    • Join Us
  • Advocacy
    • Patient Access to Independent GI Care
      • Colorectal Cancer Screening
    • Modernizing the Stark Law
    • Saving the IOASE
    • Pathology Services Utilization
  • Resources
    • Research
    • Fact Sheets
    • Letters to Policymakers
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • DHPA in the News
    • GI News Round Up
  • Take Action
    • Past Actions

February 4, 2015

Digestive Health Physicians Association: President Obama’s Budget Would Increase Health Care Costs and Harm Quality Care by Narrowing the IOASE

February 4, 2015, Washington, D.C. – The Digestive Health Physicians Association® (DHPA®) strongly opposes the proposed narrowing of the In-Office Ancillary Services Exception (IOASE) to the federal Stark Law as detailed in President Obama’s 2016 budget.

Narrowing the exception to the federal Stark Law would prohibit independent physicians from delivering critical diagnostic tests and treatments, including cancer care, in the community setting, and would cut directly against the commitment to high quality and integrated health care for patients.

Moreover, the President’s budget would actually increase health care costs, rather than result in $6 billion in savings over 10 years, as the budget inaccurately claims. Prohibiting physicians from offering advanced diagnostic imaging, radiation therapy, physical therapy and anatomic pathology services in their medical offices would result in these services shifting to the more expensive hospital setting. It would also fuel further hospital acquisition of physician practices and other free standing community-based health care services.

“By proposing to narrow the IOASE, the Administration’s budget would effectively prevent patients from receiving high quality care in the most convenient and cost efficient health care setting – independent medical practices,” said Dr. Scott Ketover, DHPA’s President and Chairman of the Board. “This would harm Medicare beneficiaries’ ability to access care in the community setting and force them into hospitals where care is less convenient, far less personal and more expensive.”

The Administration’s proposal to narrow the IOASE for certain services is contradicted by recent, peer-reviewed studies that have shown that health care expenses increase when care is consolidated in the hospital setting and that identical health care services provided in independent medical practices is more cost efficient than hospital-based care. For example, a recent studypublished in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that spending per patient was 10.3 percent higher for hospital-owned practices when compared to independent, physician-owned medical groups. And a study published by the National Institute of Health Care Reform found that hospital outpatient costs for colonoscopy, common imaging and laboratory services were up to twice the price of those same services when provided by physician’s offices and ambulatory clinics.

Narrowing the IOASE in the manner proposed by the Administration has received little legislative support. In 2014, 31 physician specialty societies and the American Medical Association voiced their support for preserving the IOASE. The House of Medicine was joined last year by the Senate and House Physicians’ Caucuses opposing IOASE repeal for certain services. Moreover, neither the Government Accountability Office nor the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission recommends repealing the IOASE for advanced medical imaging, radiation therapy, physical therapy or anatomic pathology services.

“We support the President’s goal of improving high quality health care while reducing spending, but narrowing the IOASE will actually have the opposite result,” said Dr. Michael Weinstein, DHPA’s Chair of Health Policy. “Thwarting care in the independent setting – as this budget does – will have a negative effect on patient care and won’t reduce costs. Instead, the Administration should be proposing policies that promote and safeguard care furnished in the independent medical practice setting as a competitive counterbalance to care provided in hospitals.”

###

Filed Under: Newsroom, Press Releases

Member Spotlight

Since opening in 2004, East Valley Gastroenterology & Hepatology Associates has helped tens of thousands of people with digestive and liver disorders. They are dedicated to the future of digestive healthcare and actively participate in clinical research trials.

 

Learn more at:
www.eastvalleygastro.com

Become a Member

    Is your practice interested in promoting and preserving accessible, high quality and cost-efficient care in the independent GI medical setting? Contact us today about joining DHPA.

    Recent News

    • GI News Round Up – Friday December 18

    • DHPA Opposes Most Favored Nation Rule Announced by CMS

    • DHPA Supports USPSTF Recommendations to Begin CRC Screening at 45, Calls for More Research on Disparities in Communities of Color

    • Broad Physician Coalition Urges Trump Administration to Issue Final Rules to Modernize Stark

    • Physicians, Patients Give Telehealth High Marks During COVID-19 Pandemic

    • USA Today: Telehealth can be lifesaving amid COVID-19, yet as virus rages, insurance companies look to scale back

    • Healio Gastroenterology: Telehealth in a Pandemic, Just the Beginning of the Story

    • Ending Social Injustice and Health Care Disparities

    • Medscape: Gastroenterology Groups Map a Return to Elective Endoscopy

    Digestive Health Physicians Association, Inc.
    10770 Columbia Pike, Suite 400
    Silver Spring, Maryland, 20901
    © 2020 DHPA

    Follow @DHPAnews
    Tweets by DHPAnews

    Copyright © 2021 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in